17–22 May 2026
marinaforum REGENSBURG
Europe/Berlin timezone

2.082 Impact of radiation trapping effect with spatial distribution on He I line intensity ratio method in the study on detached divertor plasma

19 May 2026, 16:20
3h
Poster F. Edge and Divertor Plasma Physics Postersession 2

Speaker

Shogo Otsuka (Tohoku Univ.)

Description

One of the most important subjects in detached divertor plasma studies is reliable diagnostics of the electron density ($n_e$) and temperature ($T_e$). He I line-intensity-ratio-method (LIR-method), based on a visible spectroscopy and a collisional-radiative (CR) analysis, offers a non-invasive measurement of these parameters. When this method is applied to plasmas with high neutral densities, reabsorption of the emitted photons called the radiation trapping becomes problematic. A practical way to account radiation trapping is to introduce the Optical Escape Factor (OEF) in CR analysis. Typically, OEFs are introduced to the resonant transitions with ground state, i.e., $1^{1}\mathrm{S}$–$n^{1}\mathrm{P}$ series. $n$ represents the principal quantum number. Calculations of the OEFs are based on spatial profiles of $1^{1}\mathrm{S}$ atoms and $n^{1}\mathrm{P}$ atoms. So far, several models have been proposed for calculation of the OEFs [1], and these models assume spatially uniform ground state atoms. However, sometimes ground state atoms have non-uniform distribution due to neutral depletion [2] or particle transport, making above assumption no longer valid.
In this situation, we propose a new model for the OEF calculation to account for the spatial distribution of the ground state atoms. Based on the model described in Ref. [1], we have extended the formulation so that it can consider any arbitrary spatial distribution of ground-state atoms. To investigate impact of the distribution assumed in the CR analysis, recently we have conducted a preliminary experiment using RF plasma. Visible lines of wavelength at 667.8 nm ($2^{1}\mathrm{P}$-$3^{1}\mathrm{D}$), 706.5 nm ($2^{3}\mathrm{P}$-$3^{3}\mathrm{S}$), and 728.1 nm ($2^{1}\mathrm{P}$-$3^{1}\mathrm{S}$) were collected for the LIR-method. In addition, the line emission from $3^{1}\mathrm{P}$ level was also collected to calculate OEFs. A Langmuir probe was also used to obtain $n_e$ and $T_e$. Results of the LIR-method using several different distributions for ground-state atoms showed that determination of $n_e$ and $T_e$ was significantly dependent on the distribution selected. However, agreement in $n_e$ and $T_e$ was relatively poor at peripheral region of the target plasma, regardless of the distribution selected. One probable reason for this disagreement is uncertainties in the OEF for $1^{1}\mathrm{S}$-$2^{1}\mathrm{P}$ transition. Currently we are trying to evaluate more reliable OEFs by adding emission from $2^{1}\mathrm{P}$ level to the CR analysis. In the presentation, we will report impact of the spatial distribution of the ground state atoms on LIR-method, based on the improved OEF calculation.

[1] Y. Iida et al, Phys. Plasma 17, 123301 (2010).
[2] R. M. Magee et al, Phys. Plasma 20, 123511 (2013).

Authors

Daichi Karahashi (Tohoku University) Hiroki Minami (Tohoku University) Hiroyuki Takahashi (Tohoku University) Keigo Yoshimura (Tohoku University) Muto Takahashi (Tohoku University) Ryosuke Taho (Tohoku University) Ryota Inoue (Tohoku University) Ryota Nishimura (Tohoku University) Shigetaka Kagaya (Tohoku university, Sendai, Japan) Shogo Otsuka (Tohoku Univ.) Tetsutarou Oishi (Tohoku University)

Presentation materials

There are no materials yet.